No more EIAs for aquaculture projects?

Bill C-38, which became law in late June 2012 and came into effect on July 20, 2012, made numerous changes to a number of governmental Acts, including the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) and the Fisheries Act.  Those following the development of Bill C-38 expressed numerous concerns over how aquatic habitats would be protected under the new CEAA (WCEL, 2012).  Relating to aquaculture, the Bill introduced a legal mechanism for offloading the responsibility for protecting fish habitat from federal to provincial authorities (WCEL, 2012).  In terms of EIA, aquaculture projects would not be considered designated projects, and would therefore not be subject to a federal EIA process.  Some postulated that no EIAs would be conducted (Aquaculture Coalition, 2012).  In the end, and at least for now, this is what has occurred – the online federal EIA database contains a number of EIAs for aquaculture projects that were underway, but were terminated as they were no longer required (e.g. one for the Shoal Bay Project discussed below,

This video shows some of the immediate impacts of fish farms in B.C.

Provincial authorities are now expected to pick up where federal authorities left off.  However, provincial laws, developed under the assumption of federal involvement in aquatic environment protection, are likely inadequate at this point (Butler, 2013).  The same goes for provincial authorities, who had previously played a smaller role in protection, and now must find room within their already restrictive budgets to take a larger role (WCEL, 2012).  In the interim, with regards to aquaculture projects, it appears as though EIAs will not be occurring.  Such is the case for a fish farm in Shoal Bay, Nova Scotia.  Although it had triggered a federal EIA in Jan. 2012, the process was aborted later in July.  The project made recent news headlines in late February of this year when it was revealed that provincial authorities had no intention of completing the EIA – as well as no immediate plans to update Nova Scotia’s Environmental Act to compensate for the federal changes.  The case was used to highlight the gap left behind by CEAA 2012 and the federal offloading of EIA responsibilities (Butler, 2013).  In March 2013, Nova Scotia’s Minister of Fisheries and Aquaculture, Sterling Belliveau, announced that it had rejected the project on the grounds that during its initial review of the project, the DFO had expressed concern that the project posed a moderate risk to wild salmon (Fish farm rejected by Nova Scotia government, 2013).  For now, it would seem provincial authorities may be able to rely on the recommendations that come out of partially completed federal EIAs to make their decisions.  However, it is clear that some adaptation to their laws and practices will need to occur.


Aquaculture Coalition. (2012). Submissions of the Aquaculture Coalition Regarding Bill C-38 Proposed Amendments to Fisheries Act and Canadian Environmental Assessment Act May 14, 2012.  (Document presented to the Cohen Commission – Commission of Inquiry into the Decline of Sockeye Salmon the Fraser River).  Retrieved 19 March 2013 from

Butler, Erica. (2013, Feb 22). No More Environmental Impact Assessments for Salmon Farms in Nova Scotia. Halifax Media Co-op.  Retrieved on 19 March 2013 from

Fish farm rejected by Nova Scotia government, risk to wild salmon cited. (2013, March 13). The Globe and Mail. Retrieved on 19 March 2013 from

Pynn, Larry. (2012, Aug 22). Feds walk away from environmental assessments on almost 500 projects in B.C. The Vancouver Sun. Retrieved on 19 March 2013 from

West Coast Environmental Law (WCEL). (2012). Bill C-38 and offloading Fisheries onto the Provinces. Retrieved 19 March 2013 from


2 thoughts on “No more EIAs for aquaculture projects?

  1. What about the need for EIA’s for the proposed industrial land based RAS feedlot salmon farming, that the Atlantic Salmon Federation and other groups are promoting to replace open net pen salmon farming in coastal areas. No one seems to have any concerns about the possibility of a huge land based RAS salmon feedlot facility could be located inland besides our freshwater resources. These farms have the possibility of posing a very high risk to wild salmon populations.

    The fact is industrial land based feedlot salmon farms are going to have an impact on the environment, contrary what the consultants and the Atlantic Salmon Federation are telling you. There can be disease when you raise animals in high density feedlot situations and the need to use antibiotics and chemicals to deal with the issues Example Langsand Laks, Denmark when they had to shut down production because of disease issues.

    The other given is that the effluent water discharge will be highly concentrated in phosphorus which isn’t easy dealt with and can cause major issues for freshwater resources. A feedlot could possibly get around this discharge issue by building a facility along the coast and discharging effluent in the ocean. What regulations are in place in Nova Scotia to monitor effluents from industrial land based RAS salmon feedlots? The proponents of RAS will say that they will grow lettuce to feed the world by utilizing the waste discharge coming from the farming operations. I
    will never consume salmon or vegetables from these land based salmon feedlots because as a consumer, I have no way of knowing whether the fish have been exposed to antibiotics on a regular basis or exposed to chemicals.

    If these industrial land based feedlot salmon farms aren’t required to disinfect all effluent water leaving the farm there will be will be a major risk to the native fish populations. The problem associated with one of the commercial RAS land based salmon feedlots recently was that they had to shut down production because of the disease frunculosis which can be lethal to wild Atlantic Salmon populations. The Nova Scotia government does not have the regulations in place at the present time to deal the possibility of having to deal with industrial land based RAS salmon feedlots moving inland or being placed all along our costal waters.

    An EIA,is used to identify any perceived negative impacts to our environment from an activity, construction projects or industry. I think we should have a discussion about the possibility that land based RAS salmon feedlots just may be the worst idea Atlantic Salmon and some other groups have come up with for three and a half decades. It was about the time that the Atlantic Salmon Federation assisted the open net pen salmon farming get started on the east coast of Canada.

    Exstream Fisherman

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s